Back to blog
Article

Xiao Yang's Office Chair Accident

Admin October 10, 2026

Xiao Yang suffered a head injury after his office chair tipped over while he was at work. He was diagnosed with a mild concussion at the hospital, and the company believes his injury was due to personal negligence rather than a work-related accident. The following analysis is conducted from three aspects: the incident's details, the company's viewpoint, and the possibility of work-related injury recognition:

Incident Details

Xiao Yang, an office worker, was using his office chair during regular working hours when it suddenly tipped backward, causing him to fall and injure the back of his head. After a professional examination at the hospital, he was diagnosed with a mild concussion. This situation indicates that Xiao Yang's injury occurred in the workplace during working hours and was directly related to work equipment (the office chair).

Company's Viewpoint

The company believes that Xiao Yang's injury was not a work-related accident but rather the result of employee negligence. The company points out that at the time of the accident, Xiao Yang was playing and joking around with colleagues and exerted excessive force, which caused the office chair to tip backward. Based on this assessment, the company tends to classify this incident as a personal behavioral error by Xiao Yang rather than a work-related accident for which the company should be held responsible.

Analysis of the Possibility of Work-Related Injury Recognition

From the perspective of work-related injury recognition, whether this incident constitutes a work-related injury needs to be judged based on relevant laws, regulations, and specific evidence. Generally speaking, work-related injury recognition requires meeting three basic conditions: 'working hours, workplace, and due to work reasons'. Although Xiao Yang's injury occurred during working hours and in the workplace, the key lies in whether it was 'due to work reasons'. If the company can provide sufficient evidence to prove that Xiao Yang was indeed playing and joking around with colleagues and exerted excessive force at the time of his injury, then this injury may be difficult to recognize as a work-related injury. However, if Xiao Yang can prove that he was not playing and joking around at the time, or that the office chair had quality issues or design flaws that caused it to tip over, then his injury may still be recognized as a work-related injury.