Liping Office Chair Purchase Information
The purchase information of office chairs in Liping involves different units and suppliers, with the details as follows:

I. Purchase of Office Chairs by Liping County Public Security Bureau
On August 20, 2026, Liping County Public Security Bureau completed the contract performance acceptance of the office chair procurement project through Liping County Hongyun Furniture Plaza. This procurement involved two bidding numbers: 2221351000001076320 and 2221351000001076243, both provided by Liping County Hongyun Furniture Plaza as the performance supplier. Currently, the publicly available information does not specify the exact model, quantity, or unit price of the procurement, but it can be confirmed that the procurement project has passed acceptance, indicating that the supplier has completed delivery as required by the contract. Such procurements typically need to meet the durability, safety, and functionality requirements of the public security system for office furniture, with factors such as backrest support strength and wheel silence possibly being key considerations.
II. Purchase of Office Chairs by Liping County No. 8 Middle School
On September 11, 2026, Liping County No. 8 Middle School completed the office chair procurement through an online supermarket procurement project (number 2081351000001114043). The winning bidder was Liping County Wenzhongcheng Cultural and Sports Store, with a winning bid amount of 2340 yuan. The specific procurement item was Guangsheng GS-PD08 office chairs, totaling 9 chairs, with a unit price of 260 yuan per chair. This model is a bow-shaped chair conference chair, featuring a black leather surface material, suitable for scenarios such as school conference rooms, classrooms, or offices. Its design features may include a non-rolling structure (fixed design of bow-shaped chairs), easy-to-clean leather surface, and ergonomic support to meet the economic and practical needs of educational institutions for furniture.
III. Analysis of Differences in Procurement Modes
There are significant differences in the procurement modes of the two units: The public security bureau adopts a contract performance acceptance process with clear bidding numbers, which may involve stricter qualification reviews and technical parameter requirements; while the school uses online supermarket procurement, with a more streamlined process suitable for standardized and small-batch procurements. In addition, the public security bureau has not disclosed unit price information, which may be related to the scale of procurement or confidentiality; while the school procurement clearly states the unit price, reflecting the trend of transparency in procurement within the education system.




